25 June
2004

eMail Free Days Not the Answer

Datamail has declared an
"Email Free Day"
in an attempt to reduce information overload.

To me, that is like declaring a "Traffic Free Day" to reduce congestion on the roads. That would certainly eliminate gridlock but at what cost? Don't people actually use cars to get to places where they can relate with each other to achieve something useful? Aren't car-pooling and public transport better solutions to this problem?

Information overload is not inherent in email itself but in the way it has been implemented as an individual communication medium. It is great for one-to-one, great for one-to-many but very poor for many-to-many communication. As it is usually implemented, email overloads people with content and isolates from each other and the ideas they use in their work.

What is required is for email to be implemented as a group (many to many) communication medium.




Posted by dan at 13:50 | Comments (1) | Trackbacks (0)
Comments
Re: eMail Free Days Not the Answer

More nonsense about "Email Free Days"...

Now (to quote):

Jeremy Burton at Veritas Software decreed that Fridays in his marketing department were to be "e-mail free" -- employees who needed to communicate with each other were instructed to stop by and chat or use the phone. "E-mail is supposed to be this big productivity tool, but it's getting to the point where it is out of control," says Burton, who complains that he was regularly spending two hours a day just dealing with e-mail. (quote ends)

Jeremy, how about implementing email as a collaboration medium and teaching people to use it effectively?

Article from WSJ reported by NewsScan Daily: http://www.newsscan.com/cgi-bin/findit_view?table=newsletter&dateissued=20040826#11244

Posted by: Dan at August 27,2004 11:04
Trackbacks
Please send trackback to:http://www.groupsense.net/sociocorpus/4/tbping
There are no trackback.
Post a comment